🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.